Are the New Zealand Courts actually Synagogues – Practicing Talmudic Law?


Are the courts in New Zealand in fact Synagogues practicing Talmudic Law?

Sex with 3 year old children is encouraged under Talmudic Law – this might explain why most pedophiles are protected in New Zealand with name suppression and often get off lightly if convicted at all.

If you want any justice against a pedophile you would arguable be best advised to organize it yourself and this should arguably be encouraged in any civil society.

Learn the language of the Satan worshipers and child sex offenders who run the Admiralty Courts/ Temples of Baal (Satan) – a couple of little beauties : when you plead “Not Guilty” are are actually saying “No Contest”  and your Attorney passes on everything you tell them (turns you over):

More on pedophile Lawyers/ Liars and Judges here


Comprehending the beast with which you are dealing: The Court is the synagogue. [the temple of Baal, enforcing Babylonian Talmudic Law] The gate (or bar) is the veil. The bench is the alter. The Black Robed Devil (the judge, administrative magistrate/ Administrator) is the high priest. [vicarius dei] The Attorney [from attorn = to twist or turn] is the mediator. [vicarius filii dei] {The attorney’s job is to move one into Roman ‘Civil Law’ Jurisdiction and then into Code and Rule Pleadings; remember he is by definition, a devil, too} The bailiffs, clerks, and stenographers are the high priest servants. If one enter the veil, one is there to give sacrifices. The fine is the wave (given to escape the threat of punishment) offering. The court cost is the heave (tribute or gift) offering.

[Should you enter voluntarily (traverse or subrogate), then just give your sacrifices and be a good slave and stop wasting the Court’s time. If you hire an attorney then you have volunteered, as sheep lead to slaughter and you will get what you deserve.]

How can one plea, if they “do not understand the nature and cause of the charges“? And if one is coerced to enter a plea, then that plea would have to be “Non assumpsit, Without prejudice” “…a plea by which Defendant avers that “he did not undertake” or promise as alleged by the plaintiff” with “no rights…waived”. – Black’s Law 6th Ed. A better plea is “Plea in Bar”; however, one must know proper procedure to make a plea in Bar really stick.

If one enters a plea of NOT GUILTY, one just might as well Plea Nolo Contrendere (no contest) and get it over with; because one will lose anyway, since Not Guilty is a negative and it is impossible to prove a negative. The proper Plea if you were placed in a position to have to plea, would be a Plea of “Innocence”,which is a positive Plea, something which can be proven. Remember, too, that these are courts of controversy.Learn ways and methods of avoiding controversy. These courts can, only, prevail in controversy.

THE BELLIGERENT CLAIMANT “The privilege against self-incrimination is neither accorded to the passive resistant, nor the person who is ignorant of his rights, nor to one indifferent thereto. It is a fighting clause. Its benefits can be retained only by sustained combat.”

It cannot be retained by attorney or solicitor.It is valid only when insisted upon by a belligerent claimant in person.” “The one who is persuaded by honeyed words or moral persuasion to testify or produce documents rather than make a last ditch stand, simply loses the protection. Once he testifies to part to the charges, he has waived his right and must on cross examination or otherwise, testify as to the whole transaction.

He must refuse to answer or produce, and test the matter in contempt proceedings, or by habeas corpus.” — United States v. Johnson, 76 F. Supp. 538, 540 (District Court, M.D. PA. 1947)

Once one hires an Attorney, and tell (testifies to) the Attornor (the enemy’s spy and Officer of the Court) what has happened, the Attornor is required by law to share (Discovery) ALL evidence, which he obtains from his Client, with the Prosecutor. “You have the right to remain silent, everything that you say (to any of these devils), CAN and WILL be used against YOU.” Miranda v. Arizona,  384 US 436(1966). You would be wise to remain silent! “Open mouth, insert foot!” It is all a game, you are a pawn; and you have been prearranged to be the loser. Here is another good one, learn to answer a question with question. The master asks the question and the slave or servant answers.

Never APPEAR ‘Pro se’, ‘Pro per’ or ‘Pro’ anything, not even ‘In propria persona’. Never allow the Black Robed Devil to proclaim that you are there ‘Pro se’, ‘Pro per’ or ‘Pro’ anything. Always, ALWAYS, take EXCEPTION. One does not “OBJECT” to the Judge’s utterances, one takes “EXCEPTION”.  One OBJECTS to the Prosecutor’s utterances. The Supreme Court in all of its ultimate wisdom made this ruling about those who APPEAR ‘PRO SE’: “If there is any truth to the old proverb that ‘[o]ne who is his own lawyer has a fool for a client,’ the Court by its opinion today now bestows a constitutional right on one to make a fool of himself.” — Faretta v. California, 45 L Ed 2d 562, 592 (1975); also, found at last page of 422 US 806 and 95 S Ct 2525.To become a good belligerent claimant one needs to learn the “Faretta Defense”.

Neither the court nor the state has the right or the need to know ones, family, work, military, educational or religious background. All that is needed is that one is able to read, write and speak America’s English. Stop, volunteering information. The more information one volunteers the more these devil have to use against their victim.

If one, out of necessity, must be present, [to represent the fiction] then your presence “is not the appearance” (as things unseen [being the fiction] are that which appears). ‘Sui juris’- by one’s own Right or ‘suæ potestate esse’, the lord or master of the soil the “Jus Soli” (self rule), is the MASTER of ones self and “comes now”, he or she doesn’t and cannot appear (in the airspace) above the fictional prize court.

Read Full:

The Temples of Baal (Courts of Admiralty)




(Visited 129 times)